Discussion about this post

User's avatar
TCinLA's avatar

There's something going on here engine-wise. Those three failures are two more than I knew of in ten years of flying around the Central Valley from Sac Exec. And the third wasn't an engine failure so much as it was some idiot who put the baffles in backwards on my Grumman Tiger's engine, a fact I discovered taking out of Fresno headed for VNY, but by the time I was at 3,000 feet the cylinder head temps were at the top of the yellow headed for red. I throttled back and saw Porterville airport off to the right. Fortunately my flight instructor had taught me to fly the Tiger with the throttle chopped from the point of entry to downwind, all the way to touchdown, so I was very familiar with turning it into a glider. Set up best descent and arrived over Porterville at 1800', spiraled down to pattern altitude and then put it on the ground. The mechanic just shook his head when he looked in the engine compartment.

But three failures over such a short period, there's something more than an idiot misplacing the baffles.

Thomas L Mischler's avatar

Yes, I'd say it's time for Cirrus to take a magnifying glass to these engine problems. Saving lives is the number one priority, of course, but there is also the matter of the outrageously expensive vehicle that may or may not be reusable.

I once talked with a colleague who was a former military pilot; I said I had heard that a good landing is one you can walk away from. He said, "Yes, and a great landing is one where you can still use the airplane."

33 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?