Thanks. I think a lot depends on whether the Democrats are willing and able to frame this *radical* assault on the norms of American democracy, from Trump himself and from the three justices he got onto the court, as the emergency it is.
Thanks. I think a lot depends on whether the Democrats are willing and able to frame this *radical* assault on the norms of American democracy, from Trump himself and from the three justices he got onto the court, as the emergency it is.
I mean, 4 of the justices who made this ruling were confirmed with less than 60 votes. So, why is legislation held to a higher standard than justices who are more than willing to ignore and overturn it?
Thanks. I think a lot depends on whether the Democrats are willing and able to frame this *radical* assault on the norms of American democracy, from Trump himself and from the three justices he got onto the court, as the emergency it is.
Not to beat a dead horse - but hearing some prominent voices respond by saying "now is not the time to abolish the filibuster" is... disheartening
I mean, 4 of the justices who made this ruling were confirmed with less than 60 votes. So, why is legislation held to a higher standard than justices who are more than willing to ignore and overturn it?